![]() ![]() ![]() Dreiser attains such combinatorial proficiency by operating with a rather distinct method of characterization, correlating the traits of particular characters (primarily Carrie) with a variety of forms of imagery employed to describe the external circumstances that affect them. Featuring elements of two of the most prominent literary “movements” of the time in which it was written, the very consistency of Sister Carrie seems to be built on the combination of “discrepant” parts. In the case of Dreiser’s Sister Carrie – a novel that has been repeatedly classified in separate accounts as a work of literary realism and literary naturalism – the exact opposite seems to hold true. He was an objective realist who remotely brought together his facts but at the same time he was more. But if this denomination is reflected by the acceptance of the sordid side of life and a more faithful registration of personal experience, then it can be a characteristic of his work. ![]() There was much debate to whether Dreiser was a “naturalist” after the model of Zola. Keywords: sister carrie naturalism, sister carrie realism ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |